Money moves
only when the
outcome clears.
Cleard verifies whether your API, MCP tool, or agent delivered what was asked, then charges only for accepted results, and signs a receipt your users can verify.
Stop charging for the call. Charge for the result.
From access, to usage, to outcomes.
The unit you charge for keeps moving.
Every shift moved payment closer to value. Outcomes are the end of that line, and where agents have to land.
The world already pays for outcomes.
Support agents, bug bounties, and service marketplaces already pay for accepted results. Cleard makes that model programmable for APIs, MCP tools, and agents.
Intercom
Zendesk
Sierra
HackerOneThey price on outcomes they declare. Cleard proves them.
What outcome-based pricing looks like.
You set the ladder. Payment scales with how much the agent actually delivered, nothing for a miss, more for a win.
Turn it on, and it pays both ways.
Per call you're a commodity; per outcome you're paid for the result, and the price scales with what you delivered. Your users feel it too, a failed call costs them nothing, so they try more, trust the receipt, and stay.
You decide what counts as done.
Three grades of proof. Start with a line of code (it covers most calls) and reach for more only when the work is fuzzier.
Schema valid, the field is there, it's fresh, it's not empty. One line of code, instant.
Scrape must contain a price, not a CAPTCHA. ~85% of calls.
The user sets the criteria up front. The result is scored, and payment scales to what was delivered.
"10 CTO emails, verified." 7 valid → pay for 7.
For fuzzy work code can't score, an independent judge rules. Not the seller, not the buyer.
Did the summary answer the question? Did the ticket resolve?
Proof, not promises.
A seller saying it worked isn't enough. Every accepted result ships with a signed, portable receipt your user can verify, the money simply waits until the job is done.
when it works.